Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Researches identify that many juveniles these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person. This essay will detail about why the convenience of modern technology in communication on the Internet and the bravery and confidence that they can not have in meeting one another in person will the reason for this case are, and the suitable means are training of enhance their self-confidence to the practice and promoting the serious risk behind the chat online.
On the one hand, due to the engrossing features of current smart phones, minors have gradually had propensity for utilizing mobile to socialise with each other instead of sitting conversing together. For example, the psychological reports infrom that almost teenagers assume that it is inessential and complicated demand that they have to make an appointment without the urgent require. Especially with introverts, they have tendency to stay at home rather than hanging out with their friends. This means that more and more introverts lean toward meeting one another in person because they feel more comfortable and safe when they are in their private space. Moreover, the introverts own contrast personality with the extroverts in socialising espect when a large number of them is not confident in crowded places or a direct date.
Notwithstanding, the more previous states the increasing number of young individuals is the more poor interaction in society and the menacing situation on the raise few solutions for this phenomenon. Firstly, with introverts, they should be more encouraged about asserting themself. Only by boosting their self-assuredness may they start to apt the direct meeting. Furthermore, adolescents should have more about the danger of acquaintance via streaming online applications. The reason for this is that in the present reality of life, there are myriad criminal cases that took place in various countries when young persons get to know strangers on social platform. Therefore, the old member of family enven government and school should hold different presentations about this topic.
In conclusion, the government and headmasters should organise more psychological lectures to prevent circumstances of excessive socialising online.
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
- Some people think children s spending time on TV video and PC games is good while others think it Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of international organization rather than each national government 78
- If old people are no longer physically mentally or financially able to look after themselves younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 756, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e extroverts in socialising espect when a large number of them is not confident in crowded places...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 813, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them is not confident in crowded places or a direct date. Notwithstanding, the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50724637681 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99672018431 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591304347826 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0540607572 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271217333162 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914252428055 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109484422961 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158007586616 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107241554716 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.