In their advertising business nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

In their advertising, business nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

Businesses have always sought to make a profit, and it is more common to see the advertisement everywhere around our lives. However, it is a negative trend that recent businesses highlight their products are new in many ways.
Due to the creation patterns of the ads in recent years, we can see that firms advertise their goods in many different places, such as television, social media, and even advertise on others products. In order to stimulate buying, businessmen emphasize their products are new in an ordinary condition. For instance, because of technology development, electronic products are highly competitive. If a firm launches a new product but it is worse than other choices, the consumers will choose another merchandise. To avoid this problem, many businesses will overemphasize their products and say it has the top characteristic in its industry.
I will say that business usually emphasize their products are new is a negative development. In my opinion, overemphasize their products will cause individuals mislead easily. Moreover, extraordinary ads make consumers unbelieve the products or even the businesses. Therefore, the clients nowadays usually search the reviews which others are given on the Internet or ask for free testers or samples to use them first. After determining their quality, consumers will buy them.
In conclusion, business should pay more attention on their target audience and prepare the ads which won’t cause any arguments. False advertising or emphasize their products are new is not the long-term plan to attract customers.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 61 view
2024-02-22 Elahe13 89 view
2024-02-16 minhnhat230602 73 view
Essays by user Leichun :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...see that firms advertise their goods in many different places, such as television, social medi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42276422764 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02196335883 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.130539583 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334076988071 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125712399203 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834575818437 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214011030389 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133800068502 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.