In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Advertisements play a pivotal part in persuading people to purchase goods, so many companies today strive to show consumers that their products have some special new features that those of other companies do not. This phenomenon, which I believe to be a detrimental trend, can be ascribed to the attraction humans pay to strange new things.
To commence with the reason for this development, it might originate from the impression of uniqueness and strangeness to people. Indeed, consumers have a tendency to pay less attention to advertisements or products that are too familiar with them. Therefore, they would be supremely appealing to products that are said to possess a modern function or a new ingredient, giving rise to the number of advertising emphasizing the innovation and uniqueness of goods of numerous companies.
By virtue of the negative impacts that it may exert on people, I hold a belief that this phenomenon should be eliminated. When individuals believe in the advertisements, they might purchase things without any doubt about their quality, which can have a detrimental impact on users and can be considered as a waste of funds. For instance, numerous women purchase cosmetics that are said to contain new elements beneficial for their skin without considering if they are suitable for their types of skin.
To recapitulate, as people are inclined to prefer products that are strange and new, businesses tend to insert content that emphasizes the uniqueness and newness of the products on their advertisements, which can be claimed to be a harmful development.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not. This phenomenon, which I believe to be a detrimental trend, can be ascribed ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23137254902 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1052138318 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556862745098 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5171749728 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.222222222 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236331149978 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933535940314 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541433824889 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150961205555 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349543705275 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.