today family members eat fewer meals together. Why is this? Is this a positive or negative trend?
In this contemporary era, it is observed that there is drastic change in the food consumption ways of families. In my opinion, several factors like employment, generation gap, and social media influence have transformed the dining patterns of folks all around the globe. The time spent around the dining table can play a crucial part in an individual's life, however folks are so busy doing life that they do not understand the significance of families.
To begin with, this world is a competent place and along with the extensive competition comes the hope of survival. People are unable to go home and have meals with their family because they are far away from home, working hard for the future by either studying abroad or earning wages. Another such cause due to which mankind isn't able to have lunch and dinners with the family as a whole is the generation gap. The generation gap is making life a little complicated as both the generations think and act differently. For instance, the older generation would prefer to always be prepared for the future, but the younger generation believes in acting spontaneously.
The race of keeping up and fulfilling all the materialistic needds has flushed the youngster's brains out. Social media influencers which promote ideas contrasting with the old values of love and care amongst the family members have led creating their own universe of isolation due to which they do not prefer having people around, not even family members. Some have taken the presence of family members for granted. The world is transforming into a place full of narcissists and the term family has lost its meaning somewhere.
In conclusion, relatives are not spending quality time by having meals together as they have forgotten the vital role family plays and this may lead to a world full of isolated individuals in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 56 | view |
- today family members eat fewer meals together Why is this Is this a positive or negative trend 89
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 50
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 54
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 66
- Many of the medical problems that people are experiencing in today s world are due to the fact that we have a very sedentary lifestyle 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ing table can play a crucial part in an individuals life, however folks are so busy doing l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...Another such cause due to which mankind isnt able to have lunch and dinners with the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98397435897 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66510794867 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599358974359 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8410051799 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.615384615 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12966957457 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047148486159 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467780673968 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863609121806 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430543270153 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.