Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. is this a negative or positive development?
It is no exaggeration to claim that a flat world seems to facilitate global trade when import or export practices are no longer strange. Although some lament that importing products from other countries takes a toll in general, I lean on the idea that the movement of purchasing goods brings more good than harm to the economy of both developing and developed countries.
On the one hand, poor quality along with a high intake of toxic chemicals in products received provide an incentive to importing items produced by other countries. Firstly, the difference in quality criteria must be the reason for this hesitation. Some exporting countries set relatively low requirements for their manufacturing companies in order to help them export products to other foreign countries, which leads to the importers’ fear of quality. This somehow can receive the strong censure from customers in the importing countries since it does not give them the value of money. Secondly, the amount of contaminants in merchandise is another obstacle in boosting the trade between countries. In fact, it is fairly arduous to inspect all the imported items; therefore, buyers themselves cannot guarantee whether they are absorbing a high intake of poisonous chemicals into their bodies or not. Taking Vietnam’s shrimps as a great example when in the past they used to be banned to America’s market when the government of this country unveiled an over-allowed level of chemicals in some cargos. However, with the strict regulations imposed on both importer and exporter, these worries are no longer necessary.
Currently, importing field is considered a useful tool to boost the economy of both parties involving the purchase. The term opportunity cost can demonstrate the correctness of this movement. It is widely accepted that each country has different strengths in manufacturing items; therefore, instead of wasting more material sources or labor on a particular product, they can particularly focus on another one that can bring higher benefits. That is why importing even can save manufacturing costs. Furthermore, from the importer perspective, thank this trading practice, the unemployment rate can be addressed effectively. This is because a large number of uneducated workers now are able to work in different factories when the demand for importing products augments. Hence, the prospect of the economy is likely to be predicted.
In conclusion, trading with other countries is believed to bring more advantages to both importers and exporters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- Task 1 The bar chart shows types of media to get daily news by age groups 2011 73
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 11
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the various stages involved in the production of beer 84
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... does not give them the value of money. Secondly, the amount of contaminants in ...
^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... addressed effectively. This is because a large number of uneducated workers now are able to work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37343358396 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96671145813 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573934837093 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0589691726 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221140067206 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683163604258 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449285066483 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137491646209 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292829116957 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.