Today news plays an important role in people’s lives and news media are more influential than ever before. Why is it this case? Is it positive or negative?
It is true that the era we are living is the era of news, especially news media. With the substantial advance of technology, the influence of news is stronger than ever before. This essay would attempt to look at the main causes of this tendency and find out whether it is a positive trend or not.
There is a wide array of reasons which can justify this phenomenon. First and foremost, people these days can get the latest information easily by the applications on their smart devices. The news is everywhere on their devices, thus, they will be affected even if they want or not. Secondly, the world develops expressly that there is always something new each day. Therefore, news or mainstream media are of vital importance to people if they do not want to be backward. For example, crypto coins is a new kind of money that person who knows how to take advantage of it could change their life instantly.
In my personal perspective, I think this trend has its own pros and cons. In term of the benefits it brings, people now are more aware of the world around them. Thanks to the development of internet, they are able to read the news and gain knowledge almost everywhere. For example, when the Amazon rainforest was burning, people from all around the world knew about it by the news on the internet and supported timely to extinguish the fire. Turning to the negative side, it is true that mainstream media is dominantly influential people but the news it provides is not always true. Hence, unconscious people will be affected by the fake news and have the false knowledge as well as behaviors which will lead to further consequences.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for the largely influential of news media, and I consider this phenomenon to be a both positive and negative trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-27 | Charles Le | 88 | view |
| 2022-10-27 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-27 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | Uchiha Minh | 73 | view |
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
- The major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in cities are facing Give solutions to this 84
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Today news plays an important role in people s lives and news media are more influential than ever before Why is it this case Is it positive or negative 73
- Techonology Has Changed The Way Children Spend Their Free Time Do The Advantage Outweigh The Disadvantage 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.690625 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60961076779 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4763736238 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317677909172 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963453024415 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742834386304 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202155203598 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057482558029 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.690625 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60961076779 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4763736238 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317677909172 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963453024415 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742834386304 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202155203598 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057482558029 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.