Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Internet has advanced substantially and many apps have been created on its basis with fascinating functions with socialising online as an epitome. However, it also the reason for a growing concern amongst youngsters that online meeting is step by step replacing the traditional contact. This essay would attempt to look at the main causes of this tendency and the stages to dealt with it.
There is a wide array of reasons that can be easily noticed in this phenomenon. Firstly, socialising on sites such as Facebook, youngsters are able to talk with people who are in different countries, whereas, they rarely have a chance to meet and communicate with anyone outside of their immediate circle or community when meeting real person. Secondly, online meeting protect adolescents whose health have not developed completely yet. For example, in the context of the pandemic which COVID-19 spreads largely, close contacts can easily get teenagers to suffer from this extremely hazardous disease, therefore, socialising remotely enables juveniles to have a conversation with other without any risks.
There are several methods to be proposed for adults to adress this phenomenon. Put a limit on the time that their children spend on the internet. As this feature, parents can control the time their children being online and also force them to communicate with real people. By the way, requesting the authority to enhace the quality of the local infrastructures such as playgrounds, parks to make it more appealing for the youngsters and their friends, hence, they will choose to hang out rather than staying online.
To conclude, socialising on the internet have hugely advantages for teenagers but it should only be as important as meeting face to face and different measures might be applied to inspire adolescents meeting real people.
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 89
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- The major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in cities are facing Give solutions to this 84
- Some people think that paying taxes is enough to contribute to the society Others argue that being a citizen involves more responsibilities Discuss what is your opinion 61
- Today news plays an important role in people s lives and news media are more influential than ever before Why is it this case Is it positive or negative 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o adress this phenomenon. Put a limit on the time that their children spend on th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26870748299 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77361922044 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.6754581838 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.083333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190090546699 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685945562145 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349035905279 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11854844121 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329534450065 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.