Topic: The chart below shows the percentages of five kinds of magazines sold by a company in the UK between 2001 and 2009.
The bar chart illustrates the sales performance of five distinct categories of magazines by a UK company from 2001 and 2009.
Overall, the trend for economic and movie magazines was upward while that for social ones was downward. In addition, although magazines centered on social issues had the highest sales at the beginning of the period, they were eventually replaced by those reporting on economic news.
In 2001, magazines covering social topics were bestsellers, accounting for 40% of total sales. This was followed by economics and sports, with respective figures being 25% and just under 20%. Far below were magazines reviewing music and movies, as they constituted 10% and 5% of total sales in turn.
Subsequently, the percentage of social magazines sold plummeted, reaching a record low of 5% in 2009. In contrast, the sales figures for economic and movie magazines experienced significant growth, reaching 35% and 30%, respectively in 2009, making them the top two selling categories. Meanwhile, the sales of sports magazines fluctuated, reaching a peak of 25% in 2005 but declining to 20% by the end of the period. Regarding music magazines, despite a moderate drop of 5% in 2005, their sales recovered, ending the period with 10%.
- Topic technology has developed rapidly in the last century Do you think its development is slowing now Why or why not 89
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The expansion of multinational companies and increase in globalization produce positive effects to everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Topic The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 84
- Topic Fewer young people choose to work in farming What are the reasons Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23880597015 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84731892641 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606965174129 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7141661127 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217029740355 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921371454758 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101067272247 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152499770847 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110134813263 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.