Topic: some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone.
Discuss both views and give your opinion?
People have different views whether studying in groups or individually brings more benefits. From my own perspective, group work enables students to work on their mistakes more effectively and therefore better improves individual ability.
Studying alone can be advantageous regarding self-paced learning and lower peer pressure. For the former, students can learn at their own speed, and are not rushed to do anything, from gaining input knowledge faster to taking charge of a greater role in a group activity. Students, as a result, can flexibly commit their time to studying what they are particularly concerned with as well as enjoying their own hobbies without any sense of urgency. Meanwhile, studying in groups can be challenging sometimes, especially for those who have poorer academic performance than the rest of the team. A feeling of shame and self-comparison could be created, impeding people from raising their voice, confidently expressing their opinions and finally making their own progress.
Nonetheless, students do need to get involved into group work if they really wish to foster individual development. Some people may fear that studying in groups may make them tense, especially when seeing more superior performance from answers of others in the group. However difficult the feelings might be, it is them that force people to strive for each time, then overcome adversities and gradually push their self-development forward. Another reason which makes group work rewarding is the support every single member can receive. Unlike personal study, one can get immediate assistance and remarks if he or she has yet to know answers. Not only does this save a lot of time, but this also plays an important part in enhancing teamwork spirit.
In conclusion, although each style of learning has their unique merit, studying in groups can still can have a stronger impact on a person’s ability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-13 | PhuongPhoebe | 82 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | phg_phg | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | dnnghha | 92 | view |
- The diagram below gives information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some educationalists say every child should be taught to play musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The maps below give information about a plan to redevelop an industrial site Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is widely known that despite cars damage the environment their manufacture and their use continue to increase Why is it the case How can this be controlled 89
- The bar charts show the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, nonetheless, really, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32673267327 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81419666359 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643564356436 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7427356019 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23859744625 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838156268297 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655236624729 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147430175942 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525195789609 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.