The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
In this day and age, it is evident that there is an increasing disinterest in the practice of having meals with family. This essay discusses some of the remarkable reasons and their effects.
There are two chief factors responsible for the disappearance of the family meals. Firstly, this issue is attributed to adults’ excessive concentration on work. Money is a constant source of worry and material desire is endless. People, particularly parents tend to be more assiduous hoping to get more money. Their priorities seem not to consist of mealtimes with their loved ones. Moreover, they usually eat out with their co-workers, clients, and even skip their lunch and dinner. Furthermore, the emergence of food apps offering hundreds of choices allows people to pick their preferred dishes shortly without wasting time cooking their own meals. Therefore, family mealtimes become less crucial to them.
Some fundamental influence could be anticipated. Firstly, if this trend continues, close-knit families will no longer exist. Children and parents would be less close and the family bonding could deteriorate. As a consequence, getting inadequate attention from parents can cause children to behave badly and even cause problems for society. In addition, if people abuse the apps and eat a lot of ordered food. They could consume a large amount of unhealthy which could result in them getting sick. This could lead to some detrimental health conditions relating to cardiovascular disease and obesity.
In conclusion, the fact that people tend not to eat with their families stems from work overload and the convenience of technology in the hustle of life. This situation could lead to unwanted impacts on family affection, children, and their health as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-10 | trần ngọc tuấn | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 73 | view |
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 67
- Major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in those cities are facing Suggest some solutions 89
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centers provide the best care Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject What are causes And what will be effects on society 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...meals with family. This essay discusses some of the remarkable reasons and their effects. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35125448029 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77902388514 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7628765013 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5789473684 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6842105263 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125949309369 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376862147852 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313581942665 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786686179018 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187325872362 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.