The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?

Essay topics:

The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?

Food, shelter and clothes are the fundamental need of everyone in order to survive on the earth. Presently, masses do not have tendency to share meals collectively as they used to be in the past. Here, i would like to account for various reasons along with impacts of this happening on the social life.
There are manifold causative factors behind this phenomenon. First and foremost, generation gap is responsible for this trend. To be specific, modern generation being more advanced and well-educated do not welcome the ideas of elders who have conventional thinking on dining room table. Henceforth, both generations tend to eat separately. Moreover, the rat race to earn more and more has divided the food consuming habits of individuals. To demonstrate, people have busy lifestyle therefore they do not get quality time to spend time with family and friends. Consequently, the prevalence of feeding jointly is plunging day by day.
Further emphasizing, fast food culture plays phenomenal role to stimulate people to eat independently. For illustration, folks easily get allured towards delicious and tangy taste of ready-made food which is easily available on food outlets. Apart from it, individuals resist to make healthy and nutrious food at homes on account of sedentary lifestyle. Hence, the trend to eat together is vanishing .
Numerous points can be mentioned to endorse outcomes of this happening on the society as a whole. To embark with, it leads to disintegration of families. To examplify, family members do not mutual understanding, intimacy, love and affection owing to less spending of time not even on dining. Apart from it, masses feel isolated as they do not share thoughts, problems and feelings while having meals together. As a result, vulnerable relationships are expected to be on the elevation.
To recapitulate, 'family is all in all for everyone '. Undeniably, individuals have liberty to choose eating habits according to their comfort level. However, it is advisable to manage balance between personal and professional life so that harmonious bondings can be come into existence.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 The Lazy Tiger 73 view
2019-11-15 hammy 73 view
2019-10-05 Anh Nguyen 2604 84 view
2019-10-01 nhathoa 90 view
2019-07-02 ngotrancamtu 61 view
Essays by user prabhpreet :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...y as they used to be in the past. Here, i would like to account for various reaso...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...eeding jointly is plunging day by day. Further emphasizing, fast food culture plays ph...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., the trend to eat together is vanishing . Numerous points can be mentioned to en...
^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ulate, family is all in all for everyone . Undeniably, individuals have liberty to...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to eat'.
Suggestion: to eat
...bly, individuals have liberty to choose eating habits according to their comfort level...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32835820896 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02808486668 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629850746269 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4608506555 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1363636364 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2272727273 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109343277683 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291879769474 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366806964008 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574072744928 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160567898344 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.