Traffic congestion is becoming increasingly problematic in major cities. What solution can you suggest to solve the problems?
It is generally accepted that the quantity of transportation in city centres is growing. Recently, the problem of traffic jams has been increasing incrementally leading to various problems such as environmental or mental and physical health. Thus, governments should have certain measures to address these issues. In this essay, I will offer a few solutions that might alleviate this traffic problem.
First and foremost, if the city centres are upgraded in terms of infrastructure, they would be spacious enough to reduce the probability of traffic congestion. With the increase in parking lots as well as wider roads, city dwellers might have a better experience while joining the traffic. For instance, a tunnel or a cross-bridge for specific vehicles at high volume intersections would surely mitigate the problem. However, this is an expensive solution due to the huge amount of investment it might require to carry out.
In addition, encouragement in using public transportation is another great solution with higher promising that governments should put into consideration. If a great number of travellers using private vehicles are replaced by public transportation such as buses or trains, it would certainly lead to a drop in traffic jams. For example, in Japan, most workers opt for electric trains rather than private vehicles when it comes to commutation since it is faster and safer. Of course, a large investment is also needed to improve the public transportation facilities, however, it could be covered by increasing taxes for using private transportation.
In conclusion, with the increasing number of people and vehicles in urban areas, traffic confections are inevitable. However, I believe if the governments could expand the roads or create an incentive for people to use public transportation, the issues could be solved.
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 89
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online The table shows the average number of people online each year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online The table shows the average number of people online each year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the number of people in Great Britain living alone by age from 1996 to 2012 42
- The table below shows the projected costing over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'carrying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: carrying
...e amount of investment it might require to carry out. In addition, encouragement in u...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44097222222 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16616216437 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576388888889 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7930970559 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.928571429 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152246953091 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556305417656 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467972635878 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100016098458 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571710942485 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.