Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that rich nations should accommodate more homeless people and equip them with shelters, food, water etc. This essay completely agrees with that statement because developed states have enough funds and facilities and this will create a positive development in the workforce of the host country.
Highly developed nations must give protection for the people who are affected by war or poverty because these nations have enough financial stability to provide the basic amenities. It is a humanitarian concern that the war affected citizens should not be left unattended, but they should be treated nicely with all facilities like, shelters, food, schools, colleges, hospitals etc. Most of them will be under mental tension and counselling, treatment, etc need to be made available and they should have homely feeling. For example, US is accommodating more and more Somalians and Africans nowadays because these countries are totally affected by the fight and poverty.
Another reason why immigrants should be safeguarded is because the fact that the manpower of the domain will improve. The stateless people coming from different places and with different skills and qualification can contribute much of the host country. The companies can easily avail them with less compensation and also they will be ready to transfer their knowledge at the most for the country which rescued them in their helpless situation. Recent news has stated that the UK and US are benefiting from refugees with their skill and knowledge because they open their door and accepting a big number of people who are affected by economic and non economic disasters.
In conclusion, refugees must be protected by developed nations because economically developed nations can assist them with their basic needs and also it will generate a new highly developed manpower. Therefore, I believe that more high class states should come forward to accept homeless.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | bluesky9667 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | bluesky9667 | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Helen Ng | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Dr. Blessy | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Dr. Blessy | 56 | view |
- The graph below given information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37133550489 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.677464989 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543973941368 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.4106524735 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.416666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190404220507 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764161782961 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384079365794 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126794960399 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141142000367 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.