Wealthy nations should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Wealthy nations should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich countries should accommodate more homeless people and equip them with shelters, food, water etc. This essay completely agrees with that statement because giving protection for people who escape from their own country is the responsibility of all and also it will increase the number of labor force.

People who are displaced from their home country should get their citizenship with basic amenities from developed countries because these people will not be having anything in their hand. It is a humanitarian concern that will lead the country in the good books of all other nations. High class states have all facilities like, schools, colleges, hospitals etc. and also funds to take care of the poor who came running by leaving everything behind including their lifetime savings, properties, buildings etc. While moving from one place to another, they even might not have taken their passport. For example, US is accommodating more and more Somalians and Africans nowadays.

Another reason why emigrants should be safeguarded is because the fact that the work force of the domain will increase. The stateless people will be very much respectful towards the nations which give shelter for them, so they will be ready to do anything for the society. Companies can avail even skilled workers with less compensation and benefits. Research shows that, 35% of the lower level employees of Apple company are from Pakistan.

In conclusion, refugees must be protected by developed nations because it is a humanitarian concern and also it will improve the manpower. Therefore, I believe that more high class nations should come forward to accept homeless.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-18 bluesky9667 73 view
2019-11-18 bluesky9667 61 view
2019-10-29 Helen Ng 73 view
2019-10-23 Dr. Blessy 56 view
2019-10-23 Dr. Blessy 56 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27881040892 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60907755587 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60594795539 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7399711389 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143340061418 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508323144136 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539180944266 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101837973242 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413992786558 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.