As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
The idea that, besides generating money, firms should also have public responsibilities remains a source of controversy. Although there are reasons to justify, I agree with that thought.
On the one hand, it is so clear that if making money is focused as the top priority at companies, it may bring benefits for the whole society. Firstly, the higher profits are earned by enterprises, the more taxes the government can receive. Consequently, it can lead the improvement of life's quality as the facilities such as schools, hospitals and roads may be concerned to built and reconstruct. Secondly, by maximizing their profits, firms can have more capital to broaden their business. Therefore, the citizens can approach to good job opportunities and rise their living standards.
On the other hand, these companies also need to be responsible for the society. It can not be deny that environment has been effected by their activities. So their duty is limiting the impact of the factory emission and irresponsible disposal of industrial waste. For example, serious environmental problems such as global warming or air pollution will be controlled if these enterprises install waste treatment systems instead of discharging chemical wastes. Another reason is that businesses should help those who are less fortune, since they have money to do so. For instance, huge firms always have enhanced their public images through running charitable programs or giving scholarships for the poor people and students.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that though making money is the fundamental principle for each companies, they should reflect on their social responsibilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- The graph bellow compares changes in the birth rates of China and USA between 1920 and 2000. 67
- whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck to what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- The world natural resources are being consumed at an over-increased rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 67
- as well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- the bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43939393939 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02175878766 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7702586035 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.571428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165288439728 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050965872251 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584727713413 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109109399355 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406082012921 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.