When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Regarding the architecture of a building, people have different opinions about whether the functionality or the exterior features carry more weight. I believe that these two factors play equally essential roles, and I will elaborate on my reasons below.
On the one hand, the intended use of a complex has significant values, especially for its users. Whether it is an individual house or a workplace, people often spend the majority of their time inside the building. Therefore, the design of a high-quality building must satisfy the basic needs of inhabitants, such as functional ventilating systems or spacious areas. Besides, if the designers pay attention to interior features while establishing a complex, a great deal of money can be saved. For example, the operation cost can be remarkably reduced thanks to the use of energy-efficient materials such as double-glazed windows in high-rise buildings.
On the other hand, the outward appearance of a structure counts when it comes to the view of the public. Aesthetic qualities should be taken into consideration when designing a building, so it would not disturb the harmony of the neighborhood. Buildings that fail to blend in would cause an eyesore and face public opposition, hindering its construction process. Furthermore, investing in the outside of a building would be a wise financial decision for contructors. This is because a block of flats with a pleasing appearance would stand more chances in capturing the attention of potential buyers, creating momentum for successful business deals.
In conclusion, I believe that in terms of designing buildings, equal weights should be attached to the functionality and the look. Therefore, designers should aim for a balance between these two elements to achieve success.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16582516567 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4946973278 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155815246539 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506450034624 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372544665299 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771667188219 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480385063067 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.