Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender?
It is now widely agrees that genders are differenciated by their strengths and weaknesses. However, in my opinion, excluding one of the genders from engaging in a specific professions should never happen. The reasons for which will be discussed in the following essay
The first reason is that people should do what they feel like for the best results, people's will and endeavor can help them overcome the gender distance. In other words, differnces can be reduced after trainning and by experince. By the way, they can even become better at the fields than the other gender. For instance, girls, being considered biologically weaker than boys, are able to be engaged in feilds which require physical strength such as power-lifting provided that they follow strict timetable and diet.
Secondly, prejudices about genders are not always true actually but just theoretically. It can easily be realized that each gender has had many contributions to the professions which are belivied to be theirs weaknesses and the other's strengths. People can not deny that there are womens got the Nobel prizes because of their contributions to the fields of science which is believed to be more suitable for males. Or there are men, considered to be impatient and violent, engage in teaching at nursery which requires a lot of patience.
In conclusion, in spite of differences in abilities to do different things, men and women should never be banned from any certain types of profession. People should be allowed to do what they want, which will cause the most significant results.
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think is fully justified while others think it is unfair 61
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'profession'?
Suggestion: profession
...the genders from engaging in a specific professions should never happen. The reasons for wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, by the way, in my opinion, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08914728682 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77717708787 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6768637112 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.416666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175241896163 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715903667521 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634810014714 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11990449394 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506951582209 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.