1. More and more people are using computers and electric devices to access information; therefore, there is no need for printed books, magazines, and newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary global landscape, the inevitable use of digital mediums and usage of computers for information storage has sparked a debate regarding the nessecity of printed mediums and physical storage of information. I firmly disagree with this phenomenon, as printed media has its own unique value and satisfies a diverse need of certain individuals.
Firstly, the tactile experience of reading a book and turning the pages provides a sensory satisfaction. Many people like the smell of new books and pages which cannot be provided through digital forms. This experience and aspect is often overlooked while comparing the two information channels.
Secondly, the physical medium of information provides a long-lasting and reliable storage of information. Computers can malfunction, can cause loss of data, data corruption, or de-syncronization. These all technical challenges can lead to significance loss of important information. Whereas, printed materials are safe, secure and easily accessible. They are particularly important for storing information pertinent to cultural heritage, historical information and literature of different countries.
Additionally, another big challenge with digital forums is the inaccessibility. Not everyone is privillaged enough to have access to the computers. Hence, having only one channel for information will lead to depriviation for many who cannot afford to have these gadgets. Whereas, physical form of information is readily and easily accessible everywhere in the schools, colleges and libraries.
In conclusion, the importance of computers and advanced form of medium for information viewability and storage is undeniable. Yet, the co-existance of digital and printed medium is essential. The inclusive value of printed newspapers and magazines cannot be denied and obsoleted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-01 | Amna Zeeshan | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-28 | dhaivat | 78 | view |
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 73
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9358490566 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33435465545 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577358490566 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5908587872 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5294117647 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5882352941 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192798240082 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055136638738 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340749285034 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104405413621 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033112787511 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.