All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that all vehicles that burn fossil gasses should not be allowed on roads and instead they should be substituted with electric vehicles.
I completely agree on cars that runs on natural resources should be replaced by electric automobiles as they are more efficient and faster.
First of all electric automobiles are more efficient. They produce no carbon dioxide and very environmentally friendly. There is no harm to environment unlike cars that burns fuel, which makes a huge impact on air pollution by producing carbon omission. Moreover, electric automobiles also helps in contributing towards fighting with global warming and people are also slowly understanding the importance of it. For instance, most European countries including Norway and Sweden has predicted to go complete carbon omission free country by 2030 by using only electric vehicles. Tesla has already doubled its production due to high demand of electric motorcars in order to achieve the vision 2030
Secondly, electric automobiles are much faster and luxurious. All the advanced functions including GPS, auto parking and turbo boosts are already factory installed. The interior is much comfortable and user friendly while on roads and way more faster than many cars that runs on natural resources. For example, the fastest car in the market right now is by Lamborghini, which is complete electric with top speed of 300 mph.
To conclude, electric cars are the future of auto industry. They will help decrease air pollution and other environmental concerns. Also, people who enjoy some power thrill can fulfill their hobby by its speed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | drmona.914 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | drmona.914 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | Meet Kanabar | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...nd user friendly while on roads and way more faster than many cars that runs on natural res...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34496124031 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7550833646 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624031007752 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.509035161 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280508009744 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912703027479 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990578385466 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180303231073 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103490782224 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.