All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people hold that all vehicles that burn fossil gasses should not be allowed on roads and instead they should be substituted with electric vehicles.
I completely agree on cars that runs on natural resources should be replaced by electric automobiles as they are more efficient and faster.
First of all electric automobiles are more efficient. They produce no carbon dioxide and very environmentally friendly. There is no harm to environment unlike cars that burns fuel, which makes a huge impact on air pollution by producing carbon omission. Moreover, electric automobiles also helps in contributing towards fighting with global warming and people are also slowly understanding the importance of it. For instance, most European countries including Norway and Sweden has predicted to go complete carbon omission free country by 2030 by using only electric vehicles. Tesla has already doubled its production due to high demand of electric motorcars in order to achieve the vision 2030
Secondly, electric automobiles are much faster and luxurious. All the advanced functions including GPS, auto parking and turbo boosts are already factory installed. The interior is much comfortable and user friendly while on roads and way faster than many cars that runs on natural resources. For example, the fastest car in the market right now is by Lamborghini, which is complete electric with top speed of 300 mph.
To conclude, electric cars are the future of auto industry. They will help decrease air pollution and other environmental concerns. Also, people who may deem some power speed thrill can fulfill their hobby by choosing electric sports cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | drmona.914 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | drmona.914 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | Meet Kanabar | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37164750958 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73186256264 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624521072797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3269798785 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.142857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283294846881 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921162264983 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946965067342 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180163035948 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957145638324 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.