All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
Vehicles that use different type of fuels, which cause emission of gases should be expelled and replaced with electrical vehicles. In my mind, I agree with this. There are two main reason on my agreement. One is electrical cars are more environment friendly and second is world has already shortage of oil and gas.
First reason of my agreement to adopt electrical cars is they are not hazardous to nature and environment. Electrical cars are do not contribute or may be too less to global warming in comparision with cars that are operated with fuels. Fuels causes emission of various gases which electrical cars does not. Fuel, typically petrol and diesel consumed the most in cars in current situation. The extraction of these resources, processing and creating usable fuel also go thorough various stages, which is dangerous to environment where as electrical cars needs electricity which can be produced by various means without pollution. One of the popular example as far as I am aware is, one of the cities in China has adopted electrical cars, trains and buses and the pollution in the city has been reduced drastically.
Second reason why I think electrical cars should replace the conventional technology is, in future there will be lack of resources through out the globe. As it can be seen currently, there are many countries whose economy depends on oil and gas and they also claimed that there will be shortage of these in future. In the upcoming time it will be difficult to meet the demand of fuels with the available resources. Due to shortage of resources there must be an alternative to this. In fact many of the economists and thinkers believe that, the next war will be for crude only. The prices of petriol and diesel in many countries are also high because of this reason and they depend on few countries which has the resource. To avoid these circumstances, an alternative must be adopted. As per my knowledge, many countries in the world are focusing on increasing their budget on electrical cars production because of the explained reason.
Electrical cars will be the future because of their friendliness with nature and easy availability to overcome the future shortages. I strongly agree they should replace the cars that use fuels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Amna Zeeshan | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | drmona.914 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | drmona.914 | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | Meet Kanabar | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...re and environment. Electrical cars are do not contribute or may be too less to gl...
^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ages, which is dangerous to environment where as electrical cars needs electricity which...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
... future there will be lack of resources through out the globe. As it can be seen currently,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ed that there will be shortage of these in future. In the upcoming time it will be diffic...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, i think, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95287958115 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72535091728 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492146596859 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4023808961 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314412067605 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102993617352 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783494346981 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217715110463 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459326624793 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.