Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Only people who earn a lot of money are successful
It is common to consider income as the benchmark for measuring success. People who are earning more are generally thought to be more successful in life. However, I do not agree with notion. Money may be important parameters but not the only factor to define the persons success or failure.
Advocate of the viewpoint that individuals who earn well are only considered to be successful have reasons to support their argument. In this materialistic world many luxurious things can be purchased with money and people who are financially sound are able to enjoy all the luxury of the life. Moreover, they have better social status comparative to the people who have low earnings. Apart from this, people with surplus income contribute to the charity and social events, which is helpful to enhance their image further.
However, having a successful life mean living to fullest and enjoying each and every moment in depth which does not require much money. People who are able to be calm and peaceful are more happy from inside, rather than one who is running after earning more and money, if individual take proper care of his mental and physical health, he will be able to lead a better life. Enjoying the empathy and harmony of loved ones and felling of contentment are the achievements, which makes life more beautiful and allow to achieve the real success which can not be measured in numbers and described in words.
In conclusion, unequivocally earning money is the necessity of life, but using its as a tool to define success or failure of any persons will not provide the real result. Money can buy many thing, but not all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...s but not the only factor to define the persons success or failure. Advocate of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... define the persons success or failure. Advocate of the viewpoint that individua...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'achieving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: achieving
...ich makes life more beautiful and allow to achieve the real success which can not be measu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ney is the necessity of life, but using its as a tool to define success or failure ...
^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
... provide the real result. Money can buy many thing, but not all.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, apart from, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86379928315 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5109362421 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562724014337 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2001276249 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.384615385 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278816184707 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109688236395 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558233557978 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187506614231 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776932120712 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.