The effects of technology on learning foreign languages
Nowadays, using the modern technology in learning languages has become more popular. The appearance of a series of the modern technologies such as computers, radio, television, smart phone,…has positively affected on studying languages. The learners can use them to enhance the learning strategies to gain the best results.
Firstly, the modern technologies help us get useful knowledge in the easiest ways. For example, the internet is a big source of information about everything. We can easily search and look up vocabulary and structures. Moreover, the learners of English or any other languages can find movies, documentary and educated online programs and channels that we can learn the language we want. For instance, we can listen to English music or watch the foreign movies while reading subtitle to improve reading and listening skills.
The second thing is that the development of the modern technologies help us save time and money in studying language. Recently, there are a lot of the interesting applications guiding about learning languages. Instead of we have to study at the centers, we just need to use smart phones and learn at home with a cheap fees. Only by a smart phone or a computer, we can learn when we want.
Perhaps the biggest effect of the modern technologies is the development of higher thinking skills of learners. The modern devices with live images and sounds help us take up the new knowledge more easily. In fact there are many teachers use computers inside classroom to support of teaching language. Consequently, the students can enhance four skills listening, speaking, reading, and writing. The connection of pictures and words helps the learners find the way to keep knowledge in mind. As a result, a lot of students appropriately use these modern technologies, and they have become tools for learning tlanguage more effectively.
To sum up, technology has usefully affected learning some languages. We can improve our language skills thank to the modern technology. Most of us like using technology while learning language because it is modern, convenient and interesting. Hopefully in the future, there are more and more people learn languages better by technology tools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | drmona.914 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Skinny | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Skinny | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Skinny | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | Arshdeep0900 | 73 | view |
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion 73
- Is a University Degree The Key to Success 56
- The right attitudes with the new coronavirus outbreak 84
- The effects of technology on learning foreign languages 56
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using Facebook as a means of online instruction You may compare with other tools like zoom etc Relevant examples of your own experience can be included 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...omputers, radio, television, smart phone,…has positively affected on studying lang...
^^
Line 4, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and they have become tools for learning tlanguage more effectively. To sum up, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, look, moreover, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24719101124 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90970020074 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522471910112 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6482298647 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.9090909091 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308264307462 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909942859097 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874011931077 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185297039315 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914794648912 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.