The Internet is replacing books. What extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

The Internet is replacing books. What extent do you agree?

There is a controversial issue about the importance of the Internet. Some computer users believe that it is substituting books, while some readers state that it will never happen. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree that the popularity of books is fading.

Let us start with reasons why some computer users argue that the web is replacing books. The first reason is that it is more convenient to get digital version of books. People often find it difficult to get traditional books, because they are not always available in stores, but with the help of Internet it is no longer a big obstacle. Another reason is that online books can be read from a great deal of devices. Traditional books limit readers in usability, since they have to carry it apart from other things, but digital books are readable on many gadgets, such as smart phones and tablets. Therefore, it is reasonable that the Internet is displacing paper books.

However, some readers propagate that the Internet will never substitute books. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, conventional books is independent from electricity. The internet is not accessible for users, when electricity suppliers cut the power, but, in contrast to ebooks, paper ones allows people to enjoy limitlessly. Secondly, paper books create better impression. Reading traditional books share a sense of comfort in readers, as it is not only comfortable to hold, but also smells pleasant. As a result, it is rational to say that there cyber will never displace books.

In conclusion, even though some readers advocate that the Internet will never replace books, I think that more people are changing their preferences in reading.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-11 c0758910@mylambton.ca 56 view
2023-12-05 c0758910@mylambton.ca 92 view
2023-09-24 sonclhoang 56 view
2023-09-08 drmona.914 78 view
2023-07-16 dung123@ view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12676056338 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68463229242 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2421325202 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6470588235 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174620316459 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602484361621 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551119675977 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117007624442 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234608959971 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.