Living forever is a good idea. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
It is a highly debatable issue that people should live continuously without the concept of death, therefore some individuals believe that it is a good notion to become immortal. I disagree with the concept because it will increase the human population to an unexpected level and there is no benefit in living such uninteresting life forever.
Firstly, immortal life increases problems in society such as a limited amount of resources become insufficient for the growing people, therefore, being alive permanently is not a good notion. Immortality can increase the number of people living in the same place with the addition of newborn babies, thus it will be difficult for federal authority to provide sufficient resources and facilities to all. For example, highly populated nations like India and China are finding different ways to curtail birth rate as they are already exhausted with their limited resources.
Secondly, life after a certain period of time becomes boring, therefore living forever will add no value to human life. Interest in living old age after some years creates monotonous and sick life. Mostly all aged people are sick and need assistance to support their living conditions, thus living such life adds no fruit and becomes difficult and dull. A recent survey from the old home-age group revealed that 90 per cent of old people do not want to continue living in such conditions, therefore they prefer to die. Hence, living forever is not a good idea.
In conclusion, I do not believe that staying alive always is a good notion because of the limited resources cannot fulfil the needs of exceeding population and the concept of living forever does not provide valuable inputs to live.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-21 | Venkata Saikiran Kattekola | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | Venkata Saikiran Kattekola | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-25 | d-lok | 56 | view |
| 2022-06-10 | Gourav kal | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-03 | mehjabin | 74 | view |
- Governments and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than making individuals responsible for that. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Advertising is all around us, it is an unavoidable part of everyone's life, some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives while others say it is a negative one, Discuss both views and include your own opinion. 61
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defence but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree? 73
- You are living in a University residence, and you have a problem with the high levels of noise froma new campus restaurant which is open until midnight. Write a letter to the governor of theUniversity. In your letter,Complain about the situationSay why th 73
- You are going to another country to study. You would like to do a part-time job while you are studying, so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter,•give details of your study plans•explain w 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rces. Secondly, life after a certain period of time becomes boring, therefore living foreve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11387900356 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6238547832 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551601423488 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2890139547 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.636363636 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236535469493 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111124368244 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10352596595 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147799684138 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434563099608 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.