Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children You should use your own

With the development of medical technology, many vaccines nowadays are used to protect children from diseases. It is undoubtfully beneficial for children to be immunized, but there are different views on whether parents should be forced to immunize their children. While some people may argue that people should immunize their children at their own will, I completely agree that parent must immunize their children, and this immunization should be forced by law.

Firstly, forcing children's immunization by law will protect children from poorly educated families. Sometimes, children are not immunized simply because their parents do not aware of the existence of vaccines. Other poorly educated parents may not even realize the consequences of not being vaccinated. By forcing the immunization, children from these families are more likely to get protected from serious diseases, and their parents will know the importance of the use of vaccines.

Secondly, the law for immunization will help children with careless parents. Some parents are not willing to take responsibility to take care of their children. If the law is published, we can improve many children's health conditions from this kind of parents.

Finally, enforcing this law will help the group of children who suffer from discrimination. For example, in some developing counties or rural areas, boys are considered to be much more superior to girls. Thus, some families from these regions might not be willing to spend money on girls' health. By enforcing the law of childhood immunization, girls in these areas will be protected, and gender discrimination will be eliminated in terms of immunization.

In conclusion, I would argue that parents should be forced by law to immunize their children, and this will ensure that children with careless parents, and children from developing areas will be equally protected from the common diseases.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'girls'' or 'girl's'?
Suggestion: girls'; girl's
... might not be willing to spend money on girls health. By enforcing the law of childho...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43624161074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90359026875 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486577181208 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5018996028 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378783751169 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152865956658 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105579775698 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256755028988 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127044333635 0.056905535591 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.