Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private lives of famous people. We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love. We also often see pictures of them in private situations.
Is it appropriate for a magazine or newspaper to give this kind of private information about people? Give reasons for your answer.
Celebrities have superfluous impacts on lives of common people. The media and news reporters usually cover news about their private lives. I strongly believe that it is unethical and inappropriate to invade into privacy the privacy of celebrities.
To begin with, some arguments might be put forward in the favour of frequent media coverage of celebrities. Firstly, it could be argued that famous personalities are trail blazers for others to follow them. The audiences are fascinated about their lifestyles, interests and actions more than anything else. Consequently, this provokes media to report more about their private lives. Secondly, another argument is that celebrities should realize that their popularity is because of their followers and fans. In other words, being in the limelight is detriment to their privacy.
Nonetheless, these arguments do not stand up to scrutiny. The obvious reason is that it is unethical and uncivilized to intrude the privacy of any person. This might result in annoyance and irritability in certain circumstances. To illustrate, we have seen that many showbiz person lose their temper when interviewed about their private affairs. Eventually, their career will affect from these controversies. In addition to it paparazzi curtails personal freedom of celebrities which is unreasonable. Obviously, if a person is chased for each and every movement, he would be deterred to do routine chores. Consequently, the celebrities and their families would suffer from ubiquitous intervention.
In conclusion, I believe that although people are attracted towards the lives of famous person, this should not deprive them from their privacy. It is unethical to intrude into privacy and therefore, certain boundaries should be set for media and news agencies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-19 | Sara Batool | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | Sara Batool | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | RAndrewRubesh | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | Av9ash | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-30 | Fainka | 61 | view |
- your friend is about to celebrate a landmark birthday and asked for suggestions as how it should be celebrated.Write a letter.thank your friend for inviting you to the party and say that you have some ideas about how to celebrate it.suggest what type of p 89
- Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. To what extent you agree or disagree? 73
- Employers should give long holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree or disagree. 67
- Employers should give long holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree or disagree. 67
- Employers should give long holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree or disagree. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun showbiz seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much showbiz', 'a good deal of showbiz'.
Suggestion: much showbiz; a good deal of showbiz
...ances. To illustrate, we have seen that many showbiz person lose their temper when interview...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... affairs. Eventually, their career will affect from these controversies. In addition to it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56569343066 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99296108891 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565693430657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9380715112 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.2631578947 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4210526316 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135933485461 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415324985149 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442555382856 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861633520922 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107691683703 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.