Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems
Re-offending crime after the first punishment is increasingly widespread across society. Most importantly, the issue has been a bone of contention among psychologists and sociologists regarding its repetition after having a penalty. To the best of my knowledge, there are specific reasons which are burgeoning this trend, and the various imperative implication should be applied to curb it.
The principal reason is the lack of rehabilitation counseling during imprisonment. As a result, criminal viewpoints regarding the offense will remain the same, or even it can be worsening. Therefore, after their penalty, it is very likely for them to re-offend in unlawful activities. Probably the second most important reason behind this is the issue of unemployment due to criminal background. This has resulted in them being involved in further illegal activities to overcome the financial challenge, leading them to be a regular criminal in society. So, lack of employment has a direct link with such repetition.
When dealing with the first reason, an effective way to work it out would be to initiate and implement cognitive-behavioral therapy or CBT. This will help the offenders understand the deeper meaning of life and rejuvenate their moral standards, allowing them to change their perception of crimes. In the UK, for example, every offender in their custody must enroll in such a CBT program. Because of that, only 4% of criminals had found with a second-time criminal record. In reaction to the second issue is arranging vocational education and training programs so that they could live in society by utilizing such experiences. In China, for instance, each criminal must learn practical work-based training such as preparing handy-craft items, repairing electronics, driving, and the like. Therefore, it will allow them to live independently without making further illegal efforts.
In conclusion, to tackle the reappearance of wrongdoings, it is necessary to provide them with cognitive-behavioral therapy and practical training to change their insight and live self-reliantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | Raspreet s. | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | ashik031123 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | ashik031123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | Dsingn | 56 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | Dsingn | 56 | view |
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems 84
- A friend who lives in another country has invited you to come and stay with him on your next holiday You are too busy to accept the invitation Write a letter to your friend In your letter Thank him for the invitation Explain why you cannot come Ask him ab 70
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- Many Offenders commit more crime after serving the first punishments Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problems 89
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both sides and give your opinion 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56426332288 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30260863396 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598746081505 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9165335565 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.411764706 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155022896525 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482015633093 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529451968393 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960477867714 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575722698539 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.