Many people believe that big businesses in addition to generating profits should be involved in and responsible for the social life of the community. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Large companies have always attempted to come into money; however, the issue of businesses' social compulsory responsibilities is a controversial issue among people. Personally, I entirely agree with the viewpoint that businesses have to do more for the community than make money, and I will explain why in this essay.
If large companies should take participate in social life in society, by fair and impartial looking, it could have some two-way profits for both businesses and the communities. This is the fundamental idea which its reasons are categorized into three main parts. First, Since people might not apprehend that all large companies are run with the sole purpose of marketing as much advantage as possible for their own, businesses could gain people's trust and foster them to invest their money in their projects. As an example, companies could replace their prioritization from economic growth with gaining people's satisfaction.
Second, marketing development is the other advantageous consequence. It is notable, for instance, that it could offer a chance for discovering young people's talents who could not be a going concern on their own. Since businesses have to emphasize innovation and creativity in order to survive in a competitive world, they could hire talented young people, which is profitable for both sides. Third, it is generally accepted that thriving the community is imperative for a successful business. In other words, it seems that most of the prosperous activities flourish in a bustling atmosphere. So, if large companies are involved in society, they could indirectly create effective circumstances for their companies' future of business.
In summary, it might be said that expecting social obligations for large businesses in society is unacceptable because it is the government's responsibility for social supports, and companies should not take charge of it. However, it seems that the effects of this approach appear to be overwhelmingly positive, and its two-way beneficial impacts of the large companies and the communities are undeniable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-20 | balwinderbuttar01 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-20 | HARANMOL SINGH | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-17 | Rachana91 | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-05 | a_alfa69@yahoo.com | 91 | view |
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they play well Do you agree or disagree with the statement 11
- Due to television and the internet it is easier today for a large number of people to become famous Is it a positive or a negative development 92
- Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities What are the reasons Do advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 73
- Due to television and the internet it is easier today for a large number of people to become famous Is it a positive or a negative development 56
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government s responsibility Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it Discuss both views and give own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ciety is unacceptable because it is the governments responsibility for social supports, and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, third, for instance, in summary, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49226006192 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07677326981 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551083591331 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4218100247 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202859376553 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700965381245 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550175189853 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132750243207 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194378731517 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.