Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement.
Discuss this view and give your own opinion.
Way to assessing educational achievement has attracted much social concern. Many educators around the world argue that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement. Personally, I agree with this statement.
On the one hand, work performance draws much of my attention. It is widely known that, using other methods to assessing educational performance creates a chance for students to learn many skills such as presentation skill,… These skills are very helpful for students in their future career. Therefore, students are bound to acquire these skills through their learning process. As a result, students are likely to improve their work performance. More interestingly, by use other methods to assessing educational performance, students are likely to be motivated to learning. Thus, they are certain to try hard to learn many new things. Hence, it is possible for them to gain many extensive knowledge. As a consequence, their work performance is highly likely to be improved. Beyond any doubt, using other methods to assessing educational achievement improves student’s work performance.
On the other hand, it is claimed that using other methods to assess educational achievement always creates a chance for students to cheat which leads to assess wrong their work performance. However, it is just applicable to a minority. The teachers will carefully censor this methods. Therefore, cheating will not occur. Furthermore, many students are not good at performing knowledge in a paper such as many students good at verbal performance,… Therefore, this prevents these students to fully perform the best result. In addition, by using other methods to assess, many students can explore their talents which helps them find out what they like, dislike. As a result, by using other methods to assess educational achievement, people will have an overview of their work performance. Without a doubt, use other methods to assess brings many benefits to students.
All in all, work performance, overview assessment work performance are the convincing reasons for my statement. People should carefully consider my writing to make the right decision on this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...n many skills such as presentation skill,… These skills are very helpful for stude...
^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much extensive knowledge', 'a good deal of extensive knowledge'.
Suggestion: much extensive knowledge; a good deal of extensive knowledge
... Hence, it is possible for them to gain many extensive knowledge. As a consequence, their work performan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ity. The teachers will carefully censor this methods. Therefore, cheating will not o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...many students good at verbal performance,… Therefore, this prevents these students...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51169590643 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02006586887 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491228070175 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.6164391557 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6818181818 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234756221789 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079272398712 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997244321799 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188081964212 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126493845529 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.