Many people believe that formal "pen and paper" examinations are not the best method of asessing education achievement. Discuss this view and give your own opinion.
Way to assessing educational achievement has attracted much social concern. Many educators around the world argue that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement. Personally, I agree with this statement.
On the one hand, work performance draws much of my attention. It is widely known that, using other methods to assessing educational performance creates a chance for students to learn many skills such as presentation skill,… These skills are very helpful for students in their future career. Therefore, students are bound to acquire these skills through their learning process. As a result, students are likely to improve their work performance. More interestingly, by use other methods to assessing educational performance, students are likely to be motivated to learning. Thus, they are certain to try hard to learn many new things. Hence, it is possible for them to gain many extensive knowledge. As a consequence, their work performance is highly likely to be improved. Beyond any doubt, using other methods to assessing educational achievement improves student’s work performance.
On the other hand, it is claimed that using other methods to assessing educational achievement always creates a chance for students to cheat which lead to assess wrong their work performance. However, it is just applicable to a minority. The teachers will carefully censor this methods. Therefore, cheating will not occur. Furthermore, many students are not good at performing knowledge in paper such as many students good at verbal performance,… Therefore, this prevents these students to fully perform best result. In addition, by using other methods to assess, many students can explore their talents which helps them find out what they like, dislike. As a result, by using other methods to assess educational achievement, people will have overview of their work performance. Without no doubt, use other methods to assess brings many benefits to students.
All in all, work performance, overview assessment work performance are the convincing reasons for my statement. People should carefully consider my writing to make a right decision on this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...n many skills such as presentation skill,… These skills are very helpful for stude...
^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much extensive knowledge', 'a good deal of extensive knowledge'.
Suggestion: much extensive knowledge; a good deal of extensive knowledge
... Hence, it is possible for them to gain many extensive knowledge. As a consequence, their work performan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ity. The teachers will carefully censor this methods. Therefore, cheating will not o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...many students good at verbal performance,… Therefore, this prevents these students...
^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In addition, by using other methods to assess, many students can explore their ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 13.8261648746 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54572271386 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02434266697 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495575221239 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.234215062 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4545454545 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4090909091 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152911679319 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548665868119 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765358599356 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127624902897 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932061457396 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.