Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed.What is the reason for doing this?Is this a negative or positive development?

Essay topics:

Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed.
What is the reason for doing this?
Is this a negative or positive development?

In this fast paced environment, everyone is struggling to succeed and stay ahead of his fellow beings. In running days, parents compel their children to put more and more effort in order to progress in life. There are enormous reasons to this dilemma. I consider this negative development as this approach is adversely affecting our children. I shall elaborate my stance with valid examples and arguments in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, predominantly, parents pressurize kids owing to the society competition. Parents themselves faces social stress to provide high class education and life style to their kids. In order to stay in the high class they feel it essential that their kids succeed in every aspect. For instance, in the immediate social circle if one’s kid is becoming an engineer, it is obligatory for other parents to choose that level of education such as chartered accountancy of software engineering for their own child.
To elucidate it further, this mindset takes away the choice of career path from our kids. Parents make kids learn conventional subjects which some kids adapts and some stay hesitant. Parents neglects their child capabilities and do not give freedom to choose their path themselves. I personally know a person who switched his career path from engineer to professional photographer as he dint succeed in engineering field owing to least interest and right skillset.
To recapitulate the aforementioned argument, i am completely of the view that parents should avoid undue pressure on their kids and give them liberty to choose a desired career path. Parents should analyze their kid abilities and put in efforts to polish that skillset which will eventually lead them to a successful path.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the least'.
Suggestion: to the least
...dint succeed in engineering field owing to least interest and right skillset. To recapi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...capitulate the aforementioned argument, i am completely of the view that parents ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, for instance, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22775800712 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82769718668 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594306049822 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.565891189 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.93333333333 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301208985073 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100932810444 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725037697598 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173285405269 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856682227042 0.056905535591 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.