Should young people follow older people’s example or it’s good for them to challenge older people’s opinions and thoughts. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is always considered to be a rational approach having an elder’s point of view while making a decision. Some people think that the best way is to track on experienced people’s path, whereas a group of people asserts that challenging older people opinions and methods is an appropriate idea. I shall discuss both perspectives in detail before reaching a final verdict.
To begin with, predominantly, the mindful approach is to learn from the ancestor’s mistakes and analyze the challenges and obstacles they had faced. Following experienced people footsteps can be beneficial in numerous ways. For instance, somebody investing in a business for the first time, it is of paramount importance to take advise and foresee potential risks which young people can prevent by learning the mitigation methods from elder’s.
On the contrast, in order to keep the momentum with fast paced changing environment, it is essential to challenge the conventional methods; in order to replace smart work with hard work. There are innumerable examples which require an innovative hand. For instance, standard method of bookkeeping at the bank can simply be replaced with computer-based transactions record keeping. This will smoothen the reconciliation work as well as reduce the fatigue of manual input in registers. Another prominent example is the rigid political mindset of people, blindly following one political party from decades. Putting up a rational perspective can bring a positive change towards society.
To conclude, in my opinion, both perspectives hold equal significance. At some point in time, the elder’s opinion is must to have considering the criticality and nature of decision. Yet, it is equally important to raise concern against an orthodox approach which may not be adding any further value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'invests'.
Suggestion: invests
...n numerous ways. For instance, somebody investing in a business for the first time, it is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...nt in time, the elder's opinion is must to have considering the criticality and na...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, then, well, whereas, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46996466431 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13071413176 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646643109541 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0841327366 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304224982123 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824883460481 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964912273157 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183490586642 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123686289599 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.