Social media has replaced the traditional methods of communicating, and people use more
and more social media to communicate and to follow news and events. Do the advantages
outweigh the disadvantages?
With the advancement in technology, social media has replaced the conventional mechanisms of interaction and broadcasting news or events. These developments, however, have several merits such as instant access to details, easy to unite with people and comparatively reasonable in terms of pricing.
One potential drawback of using an online platform for communication is that it affects the linguistic abilities of an individual. This is due to the fact that they exchange their thoughts and opinion in an informal way. For example, WhatsApp is liable for deteriorating the English language skill of many students because of slangs commonly used on that application. Another loophole is that fake news and events get easily give on the web. This can be exemplified by an exclusive survey conducted by Indian media stating that a number of illegitimate news feeds are published from popular sites such as Twitter and Orkut. However, there are various advantages of using social media for communication and distribution of global affairs and events.
Firstly, it promotes expeditious intercommunication between friends and family members residing in another country. Secondly, this exchange of stories and daily affairs on the web are instant and moderately simple. For instance, Facebook is the most extensively used social media website that allows the user to post their life experiences and discovery by solely clicking a button. Lastly, this distribution of updates both personal and commercial is extremely affordable or at no price. In other words, a user needs to pay only for the internet charges in using these services. Nonetheless, the traditional forms of communication through cellular phone and radio did incur a significant cost of investment charges on wired setup and usage.
In conclusion, although there are demerits of using modern techniques of communication and to follow news and events like it hinders the communication skills and advertises fraudulent stories spontaneously, the advantages far supersede the disadvantages.
- Some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention, while other believe that it is the responsibility of the individual to protect themselves. Discuss both the views and give your opinion ? 67
- You eat at your college cafeteria at lunch time every day.. However, you think it needs some improvements. Write a letter to the college magazine. In your letter:•explain what you like about the cafeteria•say what is wrong with it•suggest how it cou 89
- You recently read an article in a newspaper about your childhood friend with whom you have lost contact for a long time. Write a letter to the editor. In your letter:•Say which edition and when did the article appear•Explain why you lost contact with 73
- Social media has replaced the traditional methods of communicating, and people use moreand more social media to communicate and to follow news and events. Do the advantagesoutweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people think that the government should invest money in arts and cultural events, while others believe that the government should spend money on more important things. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an informal way" with adverb for "informal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hey exchange their thoughts and opinion in an informal way. For example, WhatsApp is liable for de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5750798722 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18240051524 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607028753994 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3297742932 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249990216484 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741123452059 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883658847256 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142573950474 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312996456971 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.