Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Although some individuals believe that it is a good idea to change miserable situations such as an unpleasant job or low wages, some others opine that it is better to accept it. Both groups have some rational reasons which will be discussed in the following.

As some reasons to support the last view, two main reasons have been mentioned. Firstly, changes might be risky and unpredictable. To exemplify, individuals should spend more time and money to upgrade their businesses. However, on some occasions, they might go bankrupt and lose their money. Moreover, this group of people believes that is their destiny. In fact, they mention that people would not be able to change some conditions in life as such conditions are not in their hands. In fact, people do not have enough capability to tackle some severe situations.

Nevertheless, some other individuals agree with the former view. To put forward their idea, firstly, they think that everybody is responsible for his or her life. Indeed, people are able to change any miserable conditions, as everybody is able to change his or her life in case, they make an effort. In addition, people should try to uplift their life, otherwise, they would encounter some issues. To take an example, people who receive a low income, are always struggling with poverty. Moreover, they might suffer from depression and anxiety as they are not able to provide for their family’s necessities.
To conclude, although in some cases, people might fail to change their life, in my opinion, everybody should make an attempt to upgrade his or her life. In fact, failure is the key to success.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-18 elham mousavi 73 view
2021-08-08 elham mousavi 61 view
2021-08-08 elham mousavi 73 view
2020-09-08 chargedbyfaith 56 view
2020-07-29 Jaskaran Kaur 89 view
Essays by user elham mousavi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...act, failure is the key to success.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, in addition, in fact, such as, in my opinion, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01831501832 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63283086437 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527472527473 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9853872688 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5882352941 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206847449599 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671603469146 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684991621271 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146274260627 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900579174667 0.056905535591 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.