Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree?
Education is always about two perspectives that should be presented: theorical and practical. However, some people believe that educational programs across the boards are concentrated more on theorical than practical training, thereby lacking in some demanded skills. Personally, I am on the same side of this assertion because I believe that current educational system is focusing too much on learning facts.
First, it’s obvious that one of the most frequently task for learner is memorised as much given text-book information as possible. This is because the training methods are always about classroom activities such as remember knowledge and test students’ ability to repeat what has been written in the books. Consequently, the time for practicing skills that are related to solve real-world problems are seriously lacking.
Those facts lead to a painful reality: even some of the most accomplished students are not able to perform the most basic tasks. For example, trainings in computer science are solely focusing in theory lessons like calculus, algorithms but are forget about training soft skills. If students had a more balance time for classes both theorical and practical, not only will students get more confidents in professional environment, but the educational institution will gain more fame for producing competitive graduates.
That is not to say that theory training is unnecessary to develop student’s knowledge base. Of course, theory understanding will help to strengthen practical skills. The key here is sufficient and balance training for both.
In conclusion, it is true that today training methodology is more focus in theory instead of experimental learning that causes some undesired result in students’ knowledge and experience required for professional working. Meanwhile, balance training for both practical and text-book knowledge is the ideal, but to archive that, a systematic change, that is both time and money consuming, need to be planned carefully. And that problem is for another essay.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e facts lead to a painful reality: even some of the most accomplished students are not able...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'forgotten'.
Suggestion: forgotten
...ssons like calculus, algorithms but are forget about training soft skills. If students...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, so, then, while, even so, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58199356913 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96982546932 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572347266881 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.989121769 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135352223294 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457149416199 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428514992703 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782247505785 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495347863117 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.