Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People watch movies for self-entertainment and relaxation. In today's world, every individual owns a gadget with them, which is capable of playing videos. Some people do not go to the theatre because of it, in contrast, some find the pleasure of watching it on a big screen. This essay will explore the pros and cons of the aforementioned.
To begin with, flexibility, cost efficiency, which encourages to view movies on gadgets. For instance, while traveling viewers tend to spend their time watching films on it. Moreover, they get the flexibility of play/pause of video as and when required. Additionally, the cost of watching it on devices is affordable, furthermore, they can share with their family and friends. They can even watch together at the same time. Due to the ease of transferring files with other gadgets, this gives rise to piracy.
Secondly, the overall expenses, inflexibility, and time-consuming are the issues that a person has to go through which going to watch a movie in a cinema hall. For instance, they have to leave early from their place to reach the theatre to complete the procedure for entering the room. Therefore, they spend most of their hour traveling before watching a motion picture. Furthermore, there are other expenses incurred when they go there, such as buying popcorns, coffee, and other food items.
In conclusion, the flexibility, cost efficiency, which is provided by watching films on a phone or gadgets are better than watching a movie in theatre The problem like piracy can be handled by blocking the website from where the videos are downloaded. So, as per my opinion, there is no need to visit the cinema hall to enjoy a movie
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People watch movies for self-entertainme...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e pros and cons of the aforementioned. To begin with, flexibility, cost efficie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'viewing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: viewing
...lity, cost efficiency, which encourages to view movies on gadgets. For instance, while ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er gadgets, this gives rise to piracy. Secondly, the overall expenses, inflexib...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opcorns, coffee, and other food items. In conclusion, the flexibility, cost eff...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96808510638 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89532220999 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581560283688 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2370600668 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5625 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150943020172 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466652798014 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494688760149 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973013789374 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525718563938 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.