Some people think that the employees who have been working with the company for a longer time should only be promoted. What is your opinion?
Few individuals believe that the personnel who have been working with the organisation for an extended time should just be advanced. This essay opines that the longevity of service cannot be considered as the main criteria for promoting workers as it is an unfair strategy which would harm a corporation and its employees in the long run.
To embark with, making seniority a prime factor in promoting staff members is itself a biased approach since only the senior employees of the workforce would have the opportunity to get promoted. As a consequence, other junior subordinates who are otherwise hardworking might not get any chance of advancements. For instance, numerous multinational companies such as Cola-Cola or Facebook consider hard work, dedication and performance while promoting any employee despite the numbers of years served in the corporation. Thus, this method is detrimental not only to the personnel but also for the corporation itself as the deserving candidates who are capable of enhancing the productivity are left behind.
However, considering factors such as dedication, persistent and intellect are more advantageous as these norms provide ample opportunity to all the workforce irrespective of their association with the company. Moreover, it will inspire all the staff to work diligently and everyone has an equal chance of advancements. Hence, the productivity of a corporation will improve significantly and also hard working employees will get their fair share either a monetary benefit or a higher position. For example, Sun Pharmaceutical is a leading drug manufacturing company where the sole benchmark of getting a promotion is an outstanding performance. Due to such policy, the firm is progressing at a rapid rate becoming India's biggest pharmaceutical company in 2014.
To conclude, although senior staff members have served for a longer duration, it does not justify that they are the only ones who should be given promotions. An employee who works hard and has demonstrated the required skills should be advanced regardless of years of association with a firm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-14 | Bharat Goswami | 84 | view |
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- There seems to be an increasing trend towards assessing students through exams rather than through continual assessment What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assessment 91
- There is an increasing trend of old people living longer in many countries around the world Do you think this has a positive or a negative effect on the population as a whole 78
- Computers are being used more and more in education.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion. 84
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to our natural environment. Why is this happening? What is the solution to it? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 714, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Indias the biggest'.
Suggestion: Indias the biggest
...is progressing at a rapid rate becoming Indias biggest pharmaceutical company in 2014. To c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42249240122 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16300211304 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.2355868102 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.230769231 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310373940172 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104408660935 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850889486149 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202572645441 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793799848205 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.