Some people use the Internet to search for solutions to their medical problems. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your own opinion and examples from your experience.
According to the internet search trend by Google, 35% of the internet users use internet to find resolutions for medical issues. It is a fact that the internet is used by many people to find cures for their medical conditions. In my opinion, this trend is a negative development. Before putting forward any conclusion, it is imperative to discuss the reasons to consider this a negative progression.
To begin with, the medical information available on the internet may not be accurate and could do more harm than treating a health problem. This is to say that there is no governing body to restrict and regulated the medical information that is posted on the internet. Thus, treatment information available online may not be reliable to cure the disease and could have more adverse ramifications on the patient's health. For instance, as per the report by AIIMS hospital, 34% of medical emergency cases in 2017 were of patients who consumed wrong medicines because they read it as the best treatment on the internet.
Furthermore, people do not have medical knowledge to choose the right treatment for their problem, from the internet. Many people who do internet search for medical remedies do not have knowledge of medical stream, and they do not understand the nitty gritty of medical treatment. Hence, they may choose a remediation that is totally opposite of their health requirement. To illustrate, as per a recent news a sugar patient in Delhi, reported with 600 units of blood sugar. On inquire it was found that he started consuming more sugar to cure his insulin condition because he read this solution on the internet.
In conclusion, despite internet being the quickest method to find treatment for the ones health condition, I believe it is a negative progression because not everything posted online is reliable and people are not qualified to assess the right remedy for themselves. I use internet daily for many problems during my work, however, for medical problems doctors are experts to guide us in right direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
... have more adverse ramifications on the patients health. For instance, as per the report...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ledge of medical stream, and they do not understand the nitty gritty of medical t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04733727811 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7894309523 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488165680473 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.595331237 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.733333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248136527053 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959233533482 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729997413355 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167835325769 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642933550166 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.