In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
Although it is a society which driven mainly by a sophisticated combination of science and technology, admiration towards art has not been faded out. In fact, the limelight of many achieved musicians, painters, and writers has been increased recently. The profound meaning which art gives about life significantly contributed to this.
Firstly, if we consider musicians, over the years, many talented singers, composers, songwriters have been captivated people's hearts. Millions of copies of their albums are selling not because the technology they use to produce music, but the deep and touching feeling which some music offers. For instance, not only adolescence but also elders are enjoying such music abundantly, because of the way the melody, voice and rhythm entertaining our senses in a way which science or technology can never be impacted.
Secondly, it is reasonable to say that paintings have not been changed much due to the advancement of science. Nevertheless, art galleries, art societies are popping up in almost every city. The reason for this is because vibrant colours, textures and shapes help to see the beauty of the world, values of emotions, different sides of life in a more abstract way. People need such aspects of life in order to continue with their daily routines. If there were no places to enjoy the arts, people's lives would be dull and monotonous.
Thirdly, books provide nutritions to the soul. Writers are the people who enrich people lives with great ideas. To develop a vivid imagination, reading is a must. People respect and admire writers mainly because the insights which their writings give. For example, most of the great inventors, entrepreneurs and effective people are avid readers. The reason for this is because writing and words help to awaken our minds.
In conclusion, arts enrich and enlighten people's mind in a more profound and spiritual way to give a deeper meaning of life. Whereas science and technology are helping people in a more materialised way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | virtualpathum | 84 | view |
- Some people say that governments should subsidise fruit and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper. Others say it is better to tax unhealthy foodDiscuss both these views and give your own opinions. 84
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack of sleep cause What can be done about lack of sleep 69
- Some people believe that the radio is more enjoyable and practical than TV Do you agree 82
- Many students take part time jobs while studying at the University Is this a bad or good idea 72
- Some people prefer to raise children in the cities while others believe that children should be raised in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...selling not because the technology they use to produce music, but the deep and touc...
^^^
Line 9, column 212, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
... almost every city. The reason for this is because vibrant colours, textures and shapes he...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 368, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...e are avid readers. The reason for this is because writing and words help to awaken our mi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23312883436 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.755716295 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585889570552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4224880146 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7894736842 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17598267287 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483096889136 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388869888487 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975413146516 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341607015154 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.