are you agree or not? it is better to be safe than sorry
Being cautious is an inherent warning that is the best way to protect against the hazard. Dangers are surrounding us, and we need to be more cautious. Our ancestors had learned that surviving would obtain by cautious and careless will fall in danger. Nowadays, our world is not as dangerous as our ancestors experienced, but our world also has distinct perils that we should be aware of and put safety first.
First of all, attention to safety issues will prevent regret. We should be cautious due to unstoppable hazards around us, so we should be knowledgeable about dangerous subjects and the solving methods before they happen. Some of these dangers happen in one minute, but their effects last for a long time. For example, an earthquake is a critical event that we should know about. Furthermore, before an earthquake happens, we should allocate safe places for necessary situations and check these places for the probability of danger.
The second point that I would like to mention is that we should do our affairs as well as possible. It is our job because we should know that every work we do will return to us. Your sins will find you out. So we should do our duty as safe instead of being sorry in the future. For instance, near our home, there was an apartment made by an architect, and he did not work correctly and ignored safety instructions. He had tried to cut corners. Because of his neglect, one worker died, and he was confronted with different problems for a long time.
To sum up, it is better to be safe than sorry because we are neglecting safety issues due to a decreased budget or time, but we will be engaged in consistent suffering. Also, the lull is along with attention to safety issues.
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students do not respect their teachers as much as they did in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Professional athletes such as football and basketball players do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid 76
- When you face difficult problems in life what do you feel is the best way to solve them asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem finding information about the problem using the Internet taking a long time to think about the problem 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of and put safety first. First of all, attention to safety issues will prevent ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h different problems for a long time. To sum up, it is better to be safe than ...
^^^
Line 6, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssues due to a decreased budget or time, but we will be engaged in consistent suf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67434210526 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56232686396 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542763157895 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6447064435 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9444444444 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151552271518 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496114632643 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808916482231 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114024504821 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824369281068 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of and put safety first. First of all, attention to safety issues will prevent ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h different problems for a long time. To sum up, it is better to be safe than ...
^^^
Line 6, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssues due to a decreased budget or time, but we will be engaged in consistent suf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67434210526 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56232686396 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542763157895 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6447064435 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9444444444 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151552271518 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496114632643 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808916482231 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114024504821 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824369281068 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.