Benefits of cloud seeding
The reading article provides theoretical background on a method of reducing the amount of harmful for crops in the United States hail called cloud seeding. The silver iodide is being discarded from airplanes on storm clouds, facilitating a production of snow instead of hail. The speaker, however, contradicts the point of view that this is a beneficial method.
First of all, the author brings up certain laboratory experiments as evidence for the effectiveness of this method. He claims that the silver iodide indeed transforms water vapor from hail to snow, even despite the temperature of it, which is close to the freezing point. Nonetheless, the speaker argues that this element merely prevents any kind of precipitations. As a result, this can run the risk of causing drought.
In addition, evidence from Asia is mentioned. While the author states that cloud seeding was effective for urban areas in some Asian countries, the speaker assumes that this is not relevant for the United States. In his opinion, polluted air in that region creates favorable conditions for cloud seeding to work. It will not be advantageous for non-polluted farming areas of the United States.
Finally, local studies were also conducted. The reports directly monitored a decrease of hail in the central United States due to cloud seeding compared to other regions. The speaker stands for the opinion that the study is rather unconvincing as it was based on a mere coincidence occurred that particular year in that specific area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-24 | fash | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-19 | khagen | 60 | view |
| 2020-12-07 | Uhernandes95 | 38 | view |
| 2020-09-11 | devdevil | 60 | view |
| 2020-09-09 | aryanaf.ir | 90 | view |
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 76
- Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building 90
- Rembrandt 81
- TPO integrated 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g a production of snow instead of hail. The speaker, however, contradicts the point...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, while, in addition, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 13.8261648746 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 246.0 407.700716846 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20325203252 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77966754411 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593495934959 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4177325723 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4285714286 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138424081923 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462379262525 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078333997239 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085317974998 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661399637386 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.