celebrities influence young people more tan old people ? agree or disagree
Since the beginning of this century, celebrities have influenced people more. Famous people nowadays spread their thoughts through the social media. From personal point of view, young people can easily be influenced with their ideas more than older people, because young people tend to watch social media more than older ones, a lot of famous entertainers are young, and most of old people trust their own opinion.
The foremost point, young people have a great accessibility to the social media through the internet; moreover, they can follow celebrities’ accounts on Facebook or Instagram. For example, the youths in Egypt interested in the famous singer Amer Diab, during the previous Egyptian election he supported Abdel Fatah El-sisi, likewise lots of his fans voted to the same candidate. However, their parents did not know Amer Diab’s point of view, because they do not have Facebook. Consequently, youth tend to be influenced by the famous entertainers more than old people.
Coupled with, young people watch public media more, lots of famous entertainers and athletes are young another reason for their great influential on youths and teenagers. For example, the Liverpool footballer Mohamed Salah is an icon and role model for young people in Egypt, because he embodies the ideal of a young person who has achieved his dreams. Besides, people are interested more to people who fall in their own age. Therefore, younger person care about celebrities’ opinion more than older people.
Finally, old people believe that they are wise enough to trust their own points of views. Given that they have lived more in this world, they have more experience. A survey conducted by Psychological National Association center in California found that older people did not listen to what celebrities thought of a specific subject. Provided that old people do not trust celebrities, they will not be influenced with their opinion. As a result, celebrities’ thoughts are not important to the older people.
Taking everything into a consideration, without a doubt famous entertainers’ opinion are more significant to younger people. It is suggested to guide teenagers how to interpret celebrities’ influence to focus in the positive impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | YasamanEsml | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | mzt123 | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, therefore, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97141042348 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515492957746 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.765380612 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379782552327 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138893943099 0.076458572812 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946234637756 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237001736975 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111711160176 0.0645574589148 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.