A city wants to help teachers of its high school students (age14-18) improve their teaching. It is considering two plans:
1. Choose a small group of excellent teachers; these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teach effectively, and they will then come back to their schools and provide that training for other teachers in school.
2. Provide additional training in teaching effectively for high school teachers, using online material that each teacher will study individually.
Teachers train students who in the future, occupy other careers like doctors, farmers, etc. Therefore, having a bright future ahead is nearly impossible unless a society has meticulous teachers whose teaching is of high quality. Wanting to find an appropriate field of study in a university which determines future careers, students must effectively be taught in high schools. Consequently, their teachers should have the best possible knowledge. Governments frequently want to improve the high school teachers’ knowledge, which means that they hope to become a powerful country and be good in the industries, economics, and other parts of the society, but what is the best way to do that? Using online materials like educational videos and audiobooks is the cheapest and effective method which teachers can utilize to improve their teaching skills. Not only is there no dilemma in how to choose groups of excellent teachers to train them, but also the best way to strengthen skills is individual teaching. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my reasons for this viewpoint.
Technology leads education to increase the quality, for it uses various methods simultaneously like video or audio. Teachers, for instance, can directly observe real classes in which expert teachers are educating students, and they will know about the methods and strengths which experts have, which is more efficient than they earn this expertise verbally and without training practically. Because of this method, all teachers can individually notice what weakness they have had and make efforts to overcome it. On the other hand, Should the authority invites excellent teachers to train them, they are not probably able to transfer what they understand to other instructors. Additionally, the teachers gathered probably have a personal impression about a subject which is in reality incorrect. Only if they know all mistakes which other instructors make can they find a solution for them. As we are aware of our weaknesses better than anybody else, by individual teaching, we can learn more about our weaknesses and find out what we can do to solve them. Because of that reason, some students, for example, want to attend private classes to only focus on their weakness to get better scores although the private classes are more expensive than the public ones, which means individual teaching for either students or instructors is more efficient. As a result, the best method to improve our skills is one-on-one teaching, and the cheapest method of individual teaching is using online material.
Online contents make education system decrease problems and costs which traditional education systems have. Since for preparing online contents, they have to provide training for just one time, the costs of teaching are reduced. Furthermore, teachers who want to improve their skills have access to them whenever they need to. In case there is a new beneficial reference, they can add it readily. Conversely, in traditional educations, the governors have to invite a small group of excellent teachers to gather each successive year because if these teachers want to tutor newly hired instructors, they probably forget what they learn, or the training methods may need to amend. How to rank teachers and choose a small group from them to invite is another challenging problem, so the governor needs to find the method by which it can find the excellent ones. Additionally, the authority has to provide a space and set a time which is appropriate for all of the teachers invited. In this kind of class, experts should teach in a tight period, which can be boring. On the other hand, by providing online materials, teachers can gradually study them when thinking they need them. As a consequence, providing online materials have less both problems and costs than asking teachers to attend a class.
In conclusion, providing online materials such as educational videos and sound clips is the cheapest and efficient method which the governor can follow to improve mastery in the teaching of high school instructors. By this method, while the quality of education is improved, the costs and the problems to which traditional education systems are exposed are reduced. Teachers can provide a brighter future for our society, so we should pay special attention to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-03 | Mooooonica | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | Mooooonica | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | erfan_shak | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-15 | leilapaidar | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-13 | 地狱博士后 | 42 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to succeed you should be more like others than be different from everyone else 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Newspapers and magazines are the best methods to learn about a foreign country 73
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students age14 18 improve their teaching It is considering two plans 1 Choose a small group of excellent teachers these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teach 73
- You have long been friend with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should support scientific research even if there s no practical use 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 949, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...and set a time which is appropriate for all of the teachers invited. In this kind of class...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3655.0 1977.66487455 185% => OK
No of words: 701.0 407.700716846 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21398002853 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.14552277128 4.48103885553 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74997999682 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 307.0 212.727598566 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437945791726 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1113.3 618.680645161 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3550237254 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.833333333 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3666666667 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29497230029 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909588447504 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529158796891 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207130384962 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831374838032 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 86.8835125448 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.