Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past.
By and large, It is established beyond doubt that fast-growing technology has led to rapid lifestyle changes all over the world. One of these changes includes the relationship between individuals and their immediate family members. The majority of people think that today’s youth are more dependent on the elderly compared to the past. Contrary to popular belief, I possess the conviction that young people are more independent of their parents nowadays. In what follows, I will delve into the paramount reasons to substantiate my perspective.
First and foremost, the advent of technology and the expansion of human communication caused individuals to become more independent. It is crystal clear that, in this era, people have more access to various resources of information; thereby, they can do comprehensive research, and consequently, make wise decisions when they encounter a serious dilemma. As a case in point, when I was going to apply for an accredited university and choose a major, I got increasingly anxious and visibly disappointed at first. Being inexperienced in such fields, my parents were not able to help me work out this crucial issue. Nevertheless, I went to the university and asked some senior students and professors for advice regarding my prospective major. Then, I searched on the Internet about prosperous individuals in my intended field, and accordingly, selected my study field, and sent in my application to the university with high confidence. Had I not exploited these vast facilities, I would have trusted my parents, who might have even led me to erroneous conclusions.
The other point worth mentioning is that, in the past, living in close-knit families helped individuals to be more in touch with their family members. As a result, the actions and decisions of each member directly affected the others. Furthermore, all used to obey common misconceptions in society. By way of illustration, my grandfather pursued his father’s career as a farmer, without regard to his own passion. Therefore, he lived all his life in a rural area with his parents, which prompted them to stay on good terms with each other. Moreover, he was not allowed to pick his wife since it was the parents’ responsibility to find spouse for their kids. This example reveals how much the youth relied on their parents for the decision-making process back then.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that contemporary juveniles have high self-esteem in comparison to the past, not only because of taking advantage of technology and accessing social media but also for overcoming ancient mistake traditions.
- Are governments doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of food nutrition and healthy eating 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement These days children spend more time doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports However they should be given more time to do whatever they want 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today are less dependent on their parents than in the past 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people spend a lot of time watching sports on television or following their favorite team does it have a negative effect on their lives 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27207637232 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10849454037 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613365155131 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1015950981 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.45 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.95 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144740093748 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406328158256 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543180906202 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841613811392 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564869936422 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.