Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Nowadays, traffic congestion has made our lives more difficult, especially in big cities during rush hours. In my opinion, I believe it is vitally necessary that governments do solve the road congestion issue by requiring the fees of automobile drivers during heavy-traffic times. I feel that way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, this policy will save lives and money. To be more specific, road congestion leads to car crashes that kill innocents and cause people to lose their expensive vehicles. For example, I live in Cairo, Egypt, the most populous metropolitan city in the Arab World. We do live a stressful life due to roadway crowdedness by cars in downtowns and big squares. According to statistical numbers, Cairo holds the highest rate of road accidents in the region due to car crashes, which put human lives and cars in danger during commuting. Therefore, if our authorities impose fees on drivers, who use main streets during crowding hours, they will compel to use different roads away from traffic jam areas. In anticipation of implanting this policy, we can expect an enormous reduction in car accidents. As you can see, Cairo residents, like millions of others, in emergency need of that policy for the sake of their lives and money; otherwise, there would not be any improvement in car crashes accidents.
Secondly, another remarkably potential reason for advocating fees plan is the higher likelihood of generating revenue, which can be used by governments to solve traffic issues once and for all. To illustrate, through fees money, governments can subsidize road infrastructure, constructing new bridges, and maintains public transportations in excellent status. For example, in my country Egypt, my government commands extra cost for using highways between big cities such as the coastal roads. Obviously, from the admirable current condition of that road, it exploits the fees money to keep it that way. So, the government may follow the same path inside busy cities to invest in traffic projects and put an end to problems associated with it.
In conclusion, I undoubtedly opt for the strategy of charging drivers inside the heavy traffic areas. Not only because it will make people feel secured regarding their lives and money, but also its funds will contribute to the betterment of traffic crowding issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. First, this policy will save lives and m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... improvement in car crashes accidents. Secondly, another remarkably potential r...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fees'' or 'fee's', 'feis's'?
Suggestion: fees'; fee's; feis's
...condition of that road, it exploits the fees money to keep it that way. So, the gove...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... end to problems associated with it. In conclusion, I undoubtedly opt for the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17662337662 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8244122881 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594805194805 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3493699576 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.722222222 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181134818291 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558647671056 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454588405983 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114310399509 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435224638465 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.