Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The government should support scientific research even if there’s no practical use
Scientific research play an important role in upcoming innovations and predict the uncertain future. Some of these inquiries are applicable, while others only have theoritical approaches which may don’t have any effects on our life. The noteworthy question is that whether a government should support scientific investigations which are not practical because of lacking in resources, expensive apparatuses, etc. I personally believe that authorities only have to allocate funds for useable investigations. In what follows, I will shed light on my reasons for this viewpoint.
The most noticeable reason is that supporting inapplicable inquiries unintentionally leads prospective research to have theoritical approaches rather than be useable. Beyond doubt, finding and developing useful and experimental investigations needs more hard-working than conceptual research, for working in a applied project needs some important factors to be considered, such as limited resources and technology or possible dangers. For example, let’s suppose we designed a novel wing for airplanes. Only if we pass some standards and our project is economically justifiable is it used, while in the world of theory, we can assume anything and sketch numerous wings of aircraft with odd shapes which could not be created in reality. Because of that reason, scholars usually have a tendency toward theoritical studies, and if the government equally pay attention to them, the situation will be aggravated. Therefore, we will not have many in the field investigations that bring us a bright future and improve the technology.
Another prominent reason which deserved some words here is that every government, even powerful ones, has a limited budget, and they must spend it in a wise manner from which their people benefit. Governments have a lot of duties, and every decision which will be made by them can either increase or decrease the quality of life. Moreover, because the amount of government budget is fixed and restricted, the more they devote this budget to a less important part, the less money they have for other parts. Therefore, they should prioritize parts of a society which may need resources and facilities. Consequently, I believe that financial resources which may be wanted to devote to impractical research should be spent to improve education system, transportations, healthcare, etc. which will be a real boon to people. Therefore, wasting money on this type of research which will rarely have beneficial effects for people decreases.
In conclusion, allotting budget to impractical investigations not only adversely affects future investigations but also will be a sheer waste of money. I suggest that authorities pay attention to other parts of the society, such as building or rebuilding schools instead of spending this funds on these types of inquiries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-21 | erfan_shak | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | ememari | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to succeed you should be more like others than be different from everyone else 73
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students age14 18 improve their teaching It is considering two plans 1 Choose a small group of excellent teachers these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teach 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should support scientific research even if there s no practical use 76
- You have long been friend with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...han conceptual research, for working in a applied project needs some important fa...
^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wise manner" with adverb for "wise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... limited budget, and they must spend it in a wise manner from which their people benefit. Govern...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49095022624 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10676324275 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545248868778 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2054045444 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.35 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998704473239 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322992502278 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429856705302 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600919908197 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403183105403 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.