Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays Internet is playing a vital role in our daily life. Workers in the company attend online meetings frequently with other colleagues and managers. Students could participate in online courses and hand in homework assigned by their teachers. Compared with public transportation, I believe it is much more crucial for governments to spend money to improve Internet access.
To begin with, Internet is increasingly significant in everyday life. With Internet, people can successfully keep contact with others all over the world. For big companies, trade could be made easily and efficiently using the Internet. For instance, one of the biggest toy manufacturers in Yiwu, China usually receives thousands of deals from around the world. It is not necessary for buyers in the UK to take a time-consuming trip to China. Instead, they can utilize the Internet to have an online meeting through which they can talk about prices and some other details to make a deal. Besides, young students can effectively search information via the Internet to fulfill the tasks. Thus, measures to improve Internet access could be attached more importance.
Secondly, people gradually use less public transportation. In this constantly changing world, it is a waste of time to travel to distant places taking public transportation. It has been surveyed that nearly forty percent of managers do not usually travel to different countries to sell products. For example, the CEO of Apple, Jim Cook introduces the new Iphone through the Internet every year. People all over the world can watch this meeting online and they can get the latest information at the same time. Furthermore, much more people are not willing to take public transportation in that time is much more precious for them. Thus, public transportation is not as necessary as imagined.
In addition, money is limited for the government and it is critical to make the best use of the money. Building facilities to improve the Internet will cost less money than the construction of railways or roads. In order to enable people in remote areas to have easy access to Internet, several towers and pipelines can definitely bring them Internet, while railways and roads entail numerous people and materials to achieve this goal. For example, roads towards the village could bring convenience to those people, but even though roads are built, those villagers will be reluctant to frequently use the roads, maybe once a month since they have to pay a lot for the petrol. Then a great deal of money spent on this project is wasted.
In conclusion, although public transportation could provide people in different locations with easier access to the cities, government could not profit much from this investment considering the fact that money is limited, Internet access costs less money and bring much more profit and benefits.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 61
- All parents should be required to volunteer their time to their children's schools. 58
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2414.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19139784946 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78380098509 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2329415634 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.56 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271556473536 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814510827993 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085309536928 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16436933413 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382484120736 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.