Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Without a doubt, the job plays an essential part in our life. In modern life, the question arises about the period in which it was easier to find permanent income. Some people believe that it was easier to build a career and have a secure and successful future in the past. However, the opponents still challenge that position, stating that nowadays it is to identify the type of work which will bring a lot of profit for one's future life. While there is much to consider and contrast between both fields of thought, I concur with the former opinion which seems like a sound and reasonable choice. Still, this area deserves further speculation and scrutiny, which I will delve into.

To begin with, society in the past was less complex which means that even permanent law qualified work could bring for a family enough money for them to feel secure and comfortable. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by parent's example. When they were young both of them worked in a factory. Satisfied they were with this work not only because it was unchanging but also that money they had was enough to feed the family and have savings for the future. These factors made their life secure and they were confident about the future. In contrast, my friend who works in a similar factory nowadays is not satisfied with the salary he has and is looking for a new and more qualified job. If he had lived a few decades ago he would have been satisfied with the type of work he has now.

Furthermore, with less competition in the past, it was easier to start a new business and to succeed there, which brings a steady income and secure life in the future. Moreover, in our days a person who wants to start a company should compete with a vast amount of similar companies which is more arduous. For example, when my grandparents were adolescents they started to make shoes in their town. On the one hand, when they begin to sell the shoes in the town there were no other stores for shoes and because of this, they succeeded. On the other hand, if the person would try to open shoes store in our days one should compete with other shops in that area which exist in great amount. Without doubt, if the grandparents had started the footwear market now they would have not such a secure and successful life as they have in the past.

In light of the aforementioned reasons, I strongly believe the in the past it was easier to identify what type of job would bring success and a secure life. Not only because the law qualified work would make it possible to have solid income in the past but also that the competition was not as severe as nowadays.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-25 Zmx_6 73 view
2023-06-25 Zmx_6 73 view
2023-03-29 waliwaliwa 73 view
2023-03-29 waliwaliwa 73 view
2023-03-29 waliwaliwa 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user alexdyatlik :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...unchanging but also that money they had was enough to feed the family and have savi...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51340206186 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31052617244 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439175257732 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5422362298 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.238095238 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0952380952 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195129546863 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675174431877 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772262307594 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150705145002 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666599839696 0.0645574589148 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.