Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts. Use specific reasons and details to support your idea.
It is an indisputable fact that books, whether with a real or fictional subject, always showed the right path to the humankind throughout the history. Some people believe we live in a real world; therefore, the subject of the books has to do with real individuals and events. Although it is a common and logical belief; I subscribe to an idea that reading a non-realistic book helps the people to flourish. There are several reasons which bear in mind, two of which -that is- creativity and ease of mind will be elucidated in following paragraphs.
There are immense number of exquisite and popular books which are written endowed with the imagination of writer, solely. Reading a fictional novel helps people to think beyond the box and even change their attitude about unknown facet of a problem or phenomena. For instance, “From the earth to the moon” by Jules Verne for that time was a book only based on imagination, but for the next generations, this could pave the way for a scientific progress as a driving force. Were any constraints for the mind, the human race would never have been able to invent new technologies. In other word, the major distinct between human and other creatures is this unique ability to think beyond his mind.
Secondly, reading a book, the reader discovers a whole new world with imaginary characters that could be an escape road from the hustle and bustle of modern life. Stresses and rigors of the modern life always oppress people and even make them sick in some cases. A research conducted recently has revealed that reading a book in general and fictional novels in particular bring about ease of mind and avoiding negative thought so much so that it can to be considered as a cure for psychological pains.
In sum, with all this taken into account, reading a fictional book not only resulted in flourishing of the creativity, but brings in peace of mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific progress'.
Suggestion: scientific progress
...enerations, this could pave the way for a scientific progress as a driving force. Were any constraint...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in general, in particular, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80182926829 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63283157963 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7506060269 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.153846154 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216574912154 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755569425845 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631426892811 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130782254833 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740231491723 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.